Canon FDn 50mm 1:1.2 vs Minolta MD 50mm 1:1.2 – comparison
This comparison is very important for the honor of both manufacturing companies. Mostly for Canon, because they are alive. What about Minolta – they are dead and have nothing to lose, you know.
Minolta MD 28-70mm 1:3.5-4.8 Zoom comparison with other lenses.
This is a set of non-expensive and very common lenses. There is no need to pay a lot of money if all that is needed – is a good photo.
Minolta MD 28-70mm 1:3.5-4.8 Zoom Macro lens review
This is not a true Minolta actually, just labeled. Anyway, Minolta’s logo can’t appear on an unworthy lens.
Canon New FD 50mm 1:1.2 (nFD) lens review.
This lens always stays in the shadow of top-rated ‘L’ designed with using aspherical elements, but it looks unfair – there is a too big difference in prices with much less difference in IQ.
Minolta MD 135mm 1:2.8 vs MD 135mm 1:3.5 – comparison
Minolta MD 135mm f/3.5 has a great sharpness. It’s true and a lot of resources confirmed it. But just imagine – if the cheapest and simplest Minolta MD 135mm has so great reputation, what’s about others?
(more…)
Minolta MD 135mm 1:2.0 vs MD 135mm 1:2.8 – comparison
These are two of the best 135mm lenses by Minolta in absolutely different price categories.
Minolta MD 35-135mm 1:3.5-4.5 Zoom vs primes comparison.
The results of the zoom look good enough, but it wasn’t an easy fight.
Minolta MD 35-70mm 1:3.5 Zoom Macro vs primes comparison.
The famous zoom versus famous primes – detailed battle on the infinity.
Minolta MD 35-135mm 1:3.5-4.5 Zoom Macro lens review
After a few previous reviews of zoom, this one continues to change the standard and popular idea that old zooms are always a bad compromise. Surprisingly, it isn’t the truth again, even for this 4x MD.
