Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 – review
Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 – vintage manual lens test and review
- Official classification: New-MD
- Collector’s classification: MD III
Unexpectedly popular lens among Minolta fans. Even more – some people think that it is the best fifty ever,.. but sometimes these people say that this lens is a result of collaboration with Leica – and this is not true of course. So, don’t believe da hype (c). Anyway, independently of the fact that tests don’t display any advantages over other MD fifties, except a slightly better geometry, it is an amazing lens, like any other fifty by Minolta.
Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 (MD III, New-MD) specifications
# in minolta.eazypix.de index | 105 |
Name engraved on lens | MD |
f[mm] | 50 |
A max [1/f] | 2 |
A min[1/f] | 22 |
Lens design [el.] | 6 |
Lens design [gr.] | 5 |
Filter thread Ø front(rear)[mm] | 49 |
Lens Shade | clip-in |
closefocus[m/ft] | 0.45/1.5 |
Dimension Ø x length [mm] | 64×36 |
Weight[g] | 150 |
Year | 1981 |
Style | MD III |
Code No. (ROKKOR-X) or Order No. | 2510-100 |
Floating elements | NO |
Aperture blades number | 6 |
Confidence in the test results of reviewed copies | Very High |
Reviewed lens SN: | 2093004 |
Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 exterior
Mounted on Minolta X-700
This is a very suitable set – the camera and lens have the same design (1981 released)
Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 lens shade:
Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 sharpness
Сlose-distance resolution test, minimal distance
Testing methods description
- Target: 10-15 cm picture, printed on glossy photo paper
- Distance:10% longer than minimal focus distance marked on the lens
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF.
- The test was repeated for every F-stop on every focus position with manual focus adjustment for each shot. That is to avoid the effect of field curvature.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Scene preview
Test results (selected version, easy to compare – 4 positions)
Test results (full version – all 9 positions)
Long-distance resolution test
Testing methods description
- Target: cityscape
- Distance: > 200 meters to center focus point
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF. The focus point is on the center only.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Scene preview
Test results
Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 aberrations
Vignetting
Geometric distortion
Coma aberrations
Chromatic aberrations
Short-distance bokeh
Test conditions: lens was focused on minimal distance 0.45m, plants are in 2m distance from the camera
Long-distance bokeh
Test conditions: the lens was focused on half distance on the scale (1m), buildings are on “infinity”-distance
Light bubbles bokeh
Test conditions: lens was focused on minimal distance + 10% of scale (about 0.5m), diodes were fixed in 2m distance
Light bubbles bokeh, long-distance
On the minimal focusing distance 0.45m
Other resources with reviews:
Here you can see how the review of Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 looked right after the release in the press:
(Thanks for the material for forum.mflenses.com)
fromold Amateur Photography Magazine:
Minolta MD 50mm 1:2.0 (or Minolta MD 50mm F/2.0, New-MD, MD III design) – overall conclusion
This is cheap and common fifty of Minolta. Not so common as 50/1.7 but dozens of them can be found on auctions at any time. Also, it works very similarly to a faster 50F1.7. I envy photographers who do not pay attention to the maximum aperture size, as they can save money by getting the same photos as those who shoot with faster 50mm lenses. As in the previous case with MD 50mmF1.7 – the difference with faster lenses can’t be called as noticeable.
I know that on some forums people describe this lens as the sharpest fifty. But honestly, this lens is not the sharpest and it isn’t a disadvantage – the IQ is enough for any photographer’s tasks. In other words – this is just the usual wonderful fifty, like any other lens made by Minolta.
So, take any Minolta 50mm lens and you’ll be limited by your skills, not by the lens characteristics – these lenses are sufficient for everything, and MD 50mm F/2 is no exception.
5 Comments
Yes · 2018-09-28 at 05:29
Great review, thank you
RICK · 2019-07-07 at 05:36
I came back to this to compare the characteristics of my MC version. Nothing wrong, but, after looking closely at a couple of my pictures and liking what I saw, I wanted to see what your verdict was, but I think we might secretly have very different lenses. The most obvious difference is that the MC version has 5 aperture blades, 55mm filter threads, and slightly longer minimum focus, and but I think that it might have a very different, and possibly superior optical design compared to the MD (yes, I know they’re both 6/5, but there’s more to lens design than elements and groups, as you know). Just something to think about, in case you’re wondering what lens to review next and want to spend as little as possible!
Also, I noticed you didn’t have the long distance bokeh test posted for this lens… not critical, but I personally like it the best for examining bokeh character, which is largely what I came here to check…
Anywho, thanks for your work!
Tony · 2019-07-07 at 13:39
Thank you. Yes, everything is possible if we are speaking about Minolta. Usually, the newer lenses have a better IQ, but I know a few exclusions, so we can’t say something like ‘this lens is better because younger’ until tests will be completed. About ‘light dots bokeh’ on a far distance – I’ve added the one from archives – on shortest focusing distance only, but it’s better than nothing
RICK · 2019-07-07 at 17:17
Of course, I don’t want to get ahead of myself, but I thought you might find it interesting.
And thank you for updating the page, I really appreciate it!
Tony · 2019-07-07 at 18:56
Of course, it is interesting )), always. If I get an opportunity to test any Minolta lens which still wasn’t tested on the site – I’ll do it