Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 W – MC II – review
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 W vintage manual lens review (Minolta MC W Rokkor-NL 1:2.8 f=21mm)
- Official classification: MC
- Collector’s classification: MC II, Hills &Valleys, Knurled
It’s just my personal opinion but this mix of ultra-wide focal distance and the demonstrated resolution was one of the biggest surprises during the testing of lenses from MC II generation.
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 specifications
# in minolta.eazypix.de index | 22 |
Name engraved on lens | MC W.ROKKOR-NL |
f[mm] | 21 |
A max [1/f] | 2.8 |
A min[1/f] | 16 |
Lens design [el.] | 12 |
Lens design [gr.] | 9 |
Filter thread Ø front(rear)[mm] | 72 |
Lens Shade | clamp-on |
closefocus[m/ft] | 0.25/1 |
Dimension Ø x length [mm] | 75×67 |
Weight[g] | 510 |
Year | 1971 |
Style | MC II |
Code No. (ROKKOR-X) or Order No. | 609 |
More data
Floating elements | YES |
Aperture blades number | 6 |
Confidence in the test results of reviewed copies | High |
Reviewed Lens SN: | 1502057 |
Historical note
This optical design looks fantastic even if we forget that the lens is from the 1971 year. “Hills&Valleys” or “Knurled” design was the first reincarnation of the lens with such parameters: 21mm F2.8. It was rubberized in the next MC-X generation in 1973.
Lens has an interesting construction – the front lens is rotating during the focusing but the frame with the filter thread doesn’t move. So, if you will see in some materials that this lens has a rotating front lens – don’t worry: it wouldn’t affect a workflow with polarising or gradient filters.
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 lens exterior
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 lens shade
The lens’s shade needs a dedicated gallery because very huge and solid. There is a blue dot on the lens barrel and a blue dot on the lens shade. There are also four cuts in the base of the lens shade. When the two blue dots are lined up, the cuts in the lens shade are in correspondence to the corners of the picture. These cuts are to avoid vignetting. The dots must line up between them to have the lens shade in the right orientation on the lens.
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 mounted on camera Minolta SRT-101
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 sharpness
Сlose-distance resolution test, minimal distance
Testing methods description
- Target: 10-15 cm picture, printed on glossy photo paper
- Distance: 1.7m
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF.
- The test was repeated for every F-stop on every focus position with manual focus adjustment for each shot. That is to avoid the effect of field curvature.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Original target image (printed in horizontal orientation on 10cm X 15cm glossy photo paper)
Scene preview
Test results
Long-distance resolution test
Testing methods description
- Target: cityscape
- Distance: > 200 meters to center focus point
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF. The focus point is on the center only.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Scene preview
Test results
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 aberrations
Vignetting
Geometric distortion
Coma aberrations
Chromatic aberrations
Long-distance bokeh
Test#1
Test conditions: the lens was focused on 0.25m, buildings are on “infinity”-distance
Light bubbles bokeh – infinity
Test #1
The lens is on the minimal focusing distance 0.25m, lights are on infinity (cityscape)
Test #2
Test conditions: lens was focused on 1m, houses were fixed in infinity distance on the ground.
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 final conclusion
Let me avoid the “gem” term because it is too difficult to objectively evaluate the lenses with so wide angle of view – it’s a territory of landscapes photographers and some of them can be a “very perfectionist”, but this lens definitely should be a part of sets for photographers who are using Minolta SR-mount lenses and prefer old “Rokkor”s. All tests show excellent results, I don’t see any shortcomings worth mentioning. And the test of geometric distortion can be highlighted – the corrected geometry looks great, it’s an important trait for a so wide-angle lens. One of the coolest lenses from MC generation, strongly recommends with no doubts.
And don’t forget about standard advantages for any lens of this generation, briefly:
- Easy to perform CLA
- Steel & Glass feeling in the hands
- May help to save your pockets in crime districts
4 Comments
Howie Dewing · 2021-02-06 at 02:00
My waffle grip MC-X version vignettes like crazy at f/2.8 to the point where it’s like looking through cupped hands, so I tend to use it at f/5.6 and smaller. I still love it, and recently got a full frame mirrorless camera (Sony a7 II if you must know) to really show it off, although the lens mount converter I got for it already broke after just 3 days. GRRR!. Also, the lens’ aperture ring was just a bit loose when I got it, a bit unusual as Minolta is famous for that tight ratchet-like action, but it’s a keeper nonetheless. Someone obviously used and loved this old lens a lot. Thank you for all of the work you have done with your extensive testing. Your recommendations have enabled me to get some wonderful vintage Minolta glass I might never have known about otherwise. HNulse
Tony · 2021-02-08 at 12:26
Thank you for the feedback. And I agree about the vignetting, but – there are not many reasons to use so wide a lens with an opened aperture, and this lack can be acceptable. The lens is great
Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 vs MD 20mm 1:2.8 - comparison - Lens Works · 2020-07-27 at 11:36
[…] Previous story Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 W – MC II […]
Minolta SR ultra-wide lenses comparison - Lens Works · 2020-07-27 at 11:42
[…] Previous story Minolta MC Rokkor NL 21mm 1:2.8 W – MC II […]