Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0 – review
Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0 – vintage manual lens test and review
- Official classification: New-MD
- Collector’s classification: MD III
Some lenses don’t have high characteristics, don’t become famous, and look too simple for fans, but these lenses work and definitely provide the same result as many other even more popular analogs. This MC 200mm 1:4 is from that list – works better than expected and one of the most underrated lenses produced by Minolta.
Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0 (MD III, New-MD) specifications
minolta.eazypix.de index | 215 |
Name engraved on the lens | MD |
f[mm] | 200 |
A max [1/f] | 4 |
A min[1/f] | 32 |
Lens design [el.] | 5 |
Lens design [gr.] | 5 |
Filter thread Ø front(rear)[mm] | 55 |
Lens Shade | built-in |
closefocus[m/ft] | 2.5/8 |
Dimension Ø x length [mm] | 64×116.5 |
Weight[g] | 410 |
Year | 1981 |
Style | MD III |
Code No. (ROKKOR-X) or Order No. | 595-800 |
More data
Floating elements | NO (full support by autofocused adapters) |
Aperture blades number | 6 |
Confidence in the test results of reviewed copies | Very high |
Reviewed lens SN: | 8003651 |
Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0 exterior
Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0 mounted on Minolta X-700
This is a very suitable set – the camera and lens have the same design (1981 release)
Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0 sharpness
Сlose-distance resolution test, minimal distance
Testing methods description
- Target: 10-15 cm picture, printed on glossy photo paper
- Distance:10% longer than minimal focus distance marked on the lens
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF.
- The test was repeated for every F-stop on every focus position with manual focus adjustment for each shot. That is to avoid the effect of field curvature.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Scene preview
Test results (selected version, easy to compare – 4 positions)
Test results (full version – all 9 positions)
Long-distance resolution test
Testing methods description
- Target: cityscape
- Distance: > 200 meters to center focus point
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF. The focus point is on the center only.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Scene preview
Test results
Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0 aberrations
Vignetting
Geometric distortion
This lens doesn’t have a visible geometric distortion. No tests needed.
Coma aberrations
Chromatic aberrations
Short-distance bokeh
Test conditions: lens was focused on minimal distance 2.5m, plants are in 5m distance from the camera
Long-distance bokeh
Test conditions: the lens was focused on half distance on the scale (4.5m), buildings are on “infinity”-distance. This is a rare case for real photography but demonstrates the maximum possible blur level.
Light bubbles bokeh
Test conditions: lens was focused on minimal distance + 10% of scale (about 3m), diodes were fixed in 5m distance
Minolta MD 200mm 1:4.0(or Minolta MD 200mm F/4.0, New-MD, MD III design) – overall conclusion
The conclusion is based directly on test results: this lens is really sharp and gives smooth ‘creme’ bokeh – very universal and able to cover any photo-styles because the combination of wide-open F4 with this so long 200mm focal distance is enough for any tasks which may be imagined – portraits, landscapes, animals/birds in parks, flowers, etc.
Actually, it can be preferable instead of faster MD 200mm F2.8 because it gives another level of convenience during walks – dimensions and weight are really small. Another one plus – build-in lens-hood, forgotten by a new generation, the invention of ancient engineers. And one more unexpected plus – it has an absolutely low price, just about a few yens. Really, it’s abnormal – for today it’s one of the cheapest lenses in Minolta MD line.
The lens may be used with auto-focus adapters, but be careful – it gives too long a ‘lever’ for mount fix. Of course, it has aberrations, but anyway – it ready to work even if wide open. Powerful, long-focused, and convenient lens.
5 Comments
Peter · 2018-11-06 at 19:30
Nice review! Thanks!
dylan · 2018-12-30 at 12:54
I will buy this one! Thank you 🙂
Jack Nordine · 2020-01-07 at 08:40
Nice review, thanks!
Javier del Fresno · 2020-04-12 at 18:30
Hello,
First of all I consider that the comparisions and tests that you perform are brilliant! I would like to know that would be the difference between this lens and the Minolta MC Rokkor 4.5/200.
Thank you in advance 🙂
Tony · 2020-04-12 at 20:00
Hello,
Thank you for kind words. Sorry, at 200mm for today I have only this one: the comparison between MC 200mm f4.5 and MD 200mm f2.8 is here –
https://lens.ws//2019/04/26/lenswars-minolta-mc-rokkor-qf-200mm-f-3-5-vs-mc-rokkor-pe-200mm-f-4-5-vs-md-200mm-f-2-8/
– it seems I have to close this gap – I mean MD 200/4 vs MC 200/4.5 )).. may be at this summer