Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom – review
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom – lens review
- Official classification: New-MD
- Collector’s classification: MD III
Well, this is the first review about zoom-lens on the site. And this zoom is genius, as it often happens with Minolta.
Tests of this lens are divided for 24mm, 28mm, 35mm groups.
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom (MD III, New-MD) specifications:
# in minolta.eazypix.de index | 252 |
Name engraved on the lens | MD ZOOM |
f[mm] | 24-35 |
A max [1/f] | 3.5 |
A min[1/f] | 22 |
Lens design [el.] | 10 |
Lens design [gr.] | 10 |
Filter thread Ø front(rear)[mm] | 55 |
Lens Shade | clip-in |
closefocus[m/ft] | 0.3/1 |
Dimension Ø x length [mm] | 67×50 |
Weight[g] | 285 |
Year | 1981 |
Style | MD III |
Code No. (ROKKOR-X) or Order No. | 2509-110 |
Rings | 2-Touch |
More data
Floating elements | YES (partial support by autofocused adapters) |
Aperture blades number | 6 |
Confidence in the test results of reviewed copies | High |
Reviewed lens SN: | 1002147 |
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom lens exterior
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom mounted on Minolta X-700
This is a very suitable set – the camera and lens have the same design (1981 release)
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom lens-shade:
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom sharpness
Сlose-distance resolution test, minimal distance
Testing methods description
- Target: 10-15 cm picture, printed on glossy photo paper
- Distance: 0.5m
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF.
- The test was repeated for every F-stop on every focus position with manual focus adjustment for each shot. That is to avoid the effect of field curvature.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Original target image (printed in horizontal orientation on 10cm X 15cm glossy photo paper)
Long-distance resolution test
Testing methods description
- Target: cityscape
- Distance: > 200 meters to center focus point
- Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF. The focus point is on the center only.
- RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom TEST RESULTS on FOCUS DISTANCE = 24mm
24mm – Sharpness – a short distance
Scene preview
Test results
24mm – Sharpness – long distance
Scene preview:
Test results
24mm – Vignetting
24mm – Geometric distortion
24mm – Coma aberrations
24mm – Chromatic aberrations:
(100% crops – 300×200)
24mm – Short-distance bokeh
Test conditions: lens was focused on minimal distance 0.3m, plants are in 1.8m distance from the camera
24mm – Long-distance bokeh
Test conditions: the lens was focused on 1m, buildings are on “infinity”-distance
24mm – Light bubbles bokeh
The lens is on the minimal focusing distance 0.3m, lights are on infinity (cityscape)
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom TEST RESULTS on FOCUS DISTANCE = 28mm
28mm – Sharpness – short distance
Scene preview
Test results
28mm – Sharpness – long distance
Scene preview
Test results
28mm – Vignetting
28mm – Geometric distortion
28mm – Coma aberrations
28mm – Chromatic aberrations
28mm – Short-distance bokeh
Test conditions: lens was focused on minimal distance 0.3m, plants are in 1.8m distance from the camera
28mm – Long-distance bokeh
Test conditions: the lens was focused on 1m, buildings are on “infinity”-distance
Light bubbles bokeh
The lens is on the minimal focusing distance 0.3m, lights are on infinity (cityscape)
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom TEST RESULTS on FOCUS DISTANCE = 35mm
Sharpness – short-distance
Scene preview
Test results
35mm – Sharpness – long distance
Scene preview
Test results
Vignetting
35mm – Geometric distortion
35mm – Coma aberrations
35mm – Chromatic aberrations
35mm – Short-distance bokeh
Test conditions: lens was focused on minimal distance 0.3m, plants are in 1.8m distance from the camera
35mm – Long-distance bokeh
Test conditions: the lens was focused on 1m, buildings are on “infinity”-distance
Light bubbles bokeh
The lens is on the minimal focusing distance 0.3m, lights are on infinity (cityscape)
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom – other resources with reviews:
Here you can see how the review of this lens looked right after the release in the press:
(Thanks for the material for forum.mflenses.com)
– fromold Amateur Photography Magazine:
Minolta MD 24-35mm 1:3.5 Zoom – overall conclusion
Zoom-lenses are about convenience. And this MD 24-35/3.5 is about convenience twice. Firstly – because it’s zoom, secondly – because it is a really small lens. Size and weight of it are close to the normal fifties-lenses. Another advantage is the range: 24-35 covers most popular wide angles and I can easily imagine a photographer, who is going to use only this lens in any situation.
One more a very good trait: the lens behaves the same on any focal distances from 24 to 35mm, which makes the lens very predictable for a photographer.
Surprisingly, the geometric distortion of this lens is a little, and photos wouldn’t need an additional correction in photo-editors. I do not have big experience in photographing with zoom lenses so I imagined many more problems with geometry. But it turned out that this is quite comparable with prime lenses.
The lens should be close to F11 for providing total sharpness in corners. On the other hand – it can provide such sharpness, it is a great achievement for zoom – not a lot wide-angle primes can take this achievement. Honestly, I believe that F5.6-8 is enough for any tasks – travel, street, interior, etc. – this lens would be a very good choice for anything, and in many cases, it can be better than a pack of primes in a bag. But remember about a good light or tripod if total sharpness in corners is needed for the photo.
Of course, this zoom isn’t a ‘Bokeh-Monster’ but who cares about bokeh on so wide angles with such apertures? Finally: center and middle are fine from F5.6, but for best corners, the lens needs to be closed F8 or more.
7 Comments
Evgeny · 2018-08-26 at 23:25
It looks interesting Rokkor 40-80 2.8. Have not you tried?
Tony · 2018-08-27 at 11:23
Yes, 40-80 is interesting lens, at least because it quite unusual, but I haven’t try it, may be in future
Göran Nilsen · 2018-11-29 at 00:31
Nice Review! I have this lens and uses it with Sony A7. I have had Sony fe 16-35mm f4 oss, but this Minolta with hdr processing makes outstanding images.Minolta md and mc in general are very good lenses.
Tony · 2018-11-29 at 01:08
Thanks, and yes – just outstanding. I’m going to take it into my next trip instead of 24mm and 35mm primes – it was impossible case for me until I’ve tested this zoom
Michel · 2020-03-29 at 03:35
I personally compared this lens with the Sony Zeiss 24-70 F4 on both of my Sony A7r and A7MII and without lens corrections, this lens beat the Zeiss for sharpness, CA and distortion. So i kept this Minolta !
Tony · 2020-03-29 at 12:06
That’s great information! I’m glad to hear it. Thank you
Vice · 2024-08-20 at 12:08
Hi, I got a copy after read your review and it’s such a brilliant lens but the most surprise me is that the lens can cover the medium format sensor of GFX from 28mm. 24 has heavily vignetting but fully cover from 28 and 35 without any vignetting