Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.4 vs Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.9 – comparison

Published by Tony on

Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.4 vs Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.9 – comparison

  • Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.4 (C/Y)
  • Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.9 (C/Y)

The pair of most known normal Yashica lenses.

Lenses for the test were provided by Egor Nikolaev (Егор Николаев) – many thanks and greetings.

Copy #1 Copy #2
Serial: A1013988 A4010038643
Optical Condition: Very good Very good
Mechanical Condition: Very good Very good
Cosmetic Condition: Very good Very good

This comparison is correct only for conditions and equipment used for tests. Test results can differ if any element is changed.

Tested lenses reviews

FRONT VEW GALLERY

Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.4 vs Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.9 – comparison – sharpness/resolution

Long-distance test description

  • Camera Sony A7II (24mpx, full frame) – RAW (ARW), tripod, A-mode, ISO 100, WB fixed, SteadyShot OFF, manual focus correction for every shot
  • Targets (buildings) – fixed by gravity power on the distances in more than 200 meters
  • ARW post-processing – Capture One, default settings, 100% crops 300×200 px

50mm – Scene preview

50mm – Test results

 

Short-distance test description

  • Target: 10-15 cm picture, printed on glossy photo paper
  • Distance: 1.7m
  • Camera: Sony A7II (24mpx, full-frame, tripod, remote control). M-mode, ISO fixed, WB fixed, SteadyShot – OFF.
  • The test was repeated for every F-stop on every focus position with manual focus adjustment for each shot. That is to avoid the effect of field curvature.
  • RAW processing: Capture One, default settings. All quality settings – 100%. Crops – 300×200 px

Original target image (printed in horizontal orientation on 10cm X 15cm glossy photo paper)

50mm – Scene preview

50mm – Test results

Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.4 vs Yashica ML 50mm 1:1.9 – comparison – final conclusion

No surprises – faster lens is able to provide a better result if aperture a bit closed, but Yashica 50/1.9 still the perfect lens with a great resolution. The difference for real photography in sharpness terms doesn’t matter.